When an old news story, a concluded investigation, or outdated information remains associated with your name online, we assess the legal grounds for requesting correction, updating, name anonymization or search de-indexing, as appropriate.
Requests to correct, contextualize or update published information.
Protection of personal data where legally justified.
Requests to limit exposure of outdated or irrelevant information.
Formal requests grounded in law and respect for press freedom.
Data protection claims, constitutional relief and other remedies, case by case.
A publication may be accurate when first issued, yet its context can change. Search results today may not reflect the actual outcome of the proceedings.
“Information should be assessed not only by what it said when published, but also by what it communicates today.”
The story becomes associated with a person’s name and may be replicated by other media outlets and search engines.
That context may be absent from the original publication and from search results.
Review of publications, search results and legal context.
Analysis of relevant judicial, administrative and editorial records.
Selection of the most suitable approach for each case.
Requests to media outlets, platforms and courts, when appropriate.
Review of changes actually made to content and search results.
Our work does not seek indiscriminate removal of matters of public interest. We assess accuracy, timeliness, context and proportionality, alongside the rights of publishers and of individuals named in their reporting.
Contact the firm through its established channels. We will assess the available legal options without promising automatic outcomes.